Back in the Time Period

crabby indeed but some good points, probably, too. Maybe if I start smoking again I will develop critical reading skills. Or... cancer.

This just in... via J.B. & the Jay Bees...

QUESTION: Scott, this is ridiculous. The notion that you’re going to stand before us, after having commented with that level of detail, and tell people watching this that somehow you’ve decided not to talk. You’ve got a public record out there. Do you stand by your remarks from that podium or not?

MCCLELLAN: If you’ll let me finish.

QUESTION: No, you’re not finishing. You’re not saying anything.

QUESTION: When did they ask you to stop commenting on it, Scott? Can you pin down a date?

MCCLELLAN: Back in that time period.

QUESTION: Well, then the president commented on it nine months later. So was he not following the White House plan?

Comments

[Publicado por: 13 y/o groupie]

Andrew, I will, like, disown you as my teen idol if you start smoking again becuz.....SMOKING AIN'T SEXY!!!

I nodded my head, [but totally, TOTALLY didn't 'clap my hands and say yeah' (PUKING SOUNDS)] to 95% of that article. my g/f thought it was a SF-J advertorial, lil bit! in trying to talk about some "cutting edge, diversified" music writing, pitchfork seems a lame-ass example. because it is unreadably bad and the homebase for the myopic indie rock dilletantism he tries to dis. sorta.

and the CURATING instead of lyrical word-wanking is what makes mp3 blogs so totally awesome. or at least SUCCESSFUL, PITHY lyrical word-wanking back'd up by the funky trax?

washing city paper or whatever is a blog, right?

[Publicado por: Tobias Frere-Jonze]

I'm working on a miracle (super narrow/super legible) typeface that will let rock critics criticize AND tell stories.